4 ms·
I was going to add a comment like "No Kidding!" or "Duh!" but if you click through to the article, it's a dude asking for a system which can represent more nua
by retrocryptid 3y ago
I was going to add a comment like "No Kidding!" or "Duh!" but if you click through to the article, it's a dude asking for a system which can represent more nuance in policy arguments. I completely agree and think it's worth the 90 seconds it takes to read. My opinion is a better title for this article would be "We Need Something Better Than The Two Party System."
- jauntywundrkind 3y agoIt'd be lovely to see a government experiment with an issue based information system someday. Agree to move beyond open debate, & compel representatives to explicitly structure out issues, positions, & arguments for topics they discuss. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Issue-based_information_system https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Issue-based_information_system Just being able to capture what the different elements of policy debate really are would let so much more nuance be retained. And when going back to assess the impacts of a policy, there'd be such a clearer record of argumentation to assess: what did happen, what didn't happen, who was right here?