9 ms·
The answer would be if the weights are transformative enough, and the copyright would come from the person who decided what images to include in the training se
by stale2002 3y ago
The answer would be if the weights are transformative enough, and the copyright would come from the person who decided what images to include in the training set.
The act of choosing to place images in a certain arrangement, such as a collage, can be copyrightable. The same could be said for the "act" of choosing what images to include in a training set and which parameters to use to train the model.
- kevin42 3y agoDoes that mean if someone copies a phone book but leaves out some numbers and adds some other numbers then it's a creative work?
- stale2002 3y agoIt would depend on how transformative the work is. There is in fact a whole art form where people cut out words from different newspapers and books, for example, and re-arrange those words to form new and interesting art. So there are ways in which such a work would be a creative work, and ways it which it would not, and it would depend on the particular instance and example.
- saynay 3y agoThe legal system is not like a computer program. The line between what is "creative" and what is not concrete, but is instead up to the interpretation of the judge who rules on it. So your phonebook modifications may or may not be considered "creative" depending on the judge and your ability to convince them. The more your modify it, the more likely you are to convince a judge it is a creative work, though.