The report [0] this graph was based on also has major issues as it does not consider versions of the frameworks and includes sites using old versions of Next or

The report [0] this graph was based on also has major issues as it does not consider versions of the frameworks and includes sites using old versions of Next or Nuxt compared to only new sites for Astro as it's a new framework. There have been major changes for example between Nuxt2 (Vue2) and Nuxt3 (Vue3). They at least disclose that at the end of the report but it still leaves a bad taste because it should have been possible to differentiate these without too much work and they were aware of the problem. Another issue is that Astro seems to be used a lot for static sites whereas the others mostly for dynamic ones. I feel like it's really not a fair comparison. [0]: https://astro.build/blog/2023-web-framework-performance-report/ https://astro.build/blog/2023-web-framework-performance-repo...