>the details of the internal architecture can't change that GPT4 is definitely useful, but it points towards bad news for OpenAI and potentially the entire fie

>the details of the internal architecture can't change that GPT4 is definitely useful, but it points towards bad news for OpenAI and potentially the entire field. A lot of people really wanted to believe that OpenAI had some secret sauce that actually pointed towards a path at true AI. Turns out they just poached Google's own researchers and did a better job at turning Google research into a product(all the papers for this type of architecture came from Google Brain, authors are now at OpenAI). OpenAI is doing impressive work on the practical side of AI but apparently nothing revolutionary in terms of research, which is why people are disappointed by this reveal.