4 ms·
Ask HN: Would You Use a USPS Email Box?
If the United States Postal Service offered US citizens an email box, would you use it? Why or why not?
Many times I read on HN that people are tired of having their email scraped for advertising by Google and Yahoo, but the pain of standing up your own and domain and mail exchange is so high that many don't bother to move.
If the USPS offered every American a free email box -- universal email service, essentially -- would you take them up on the offer? Are there any limits (e.g. attachment size or retention) that would make you say no? Or are there services (e.g. certified email or digital stamps to reduce spam) that might make you say yes?
Keep in mind that this would be universal email access, so it has to be simple enough to be universal; this would probably preclude many customization options like "bring you own domain".
- PaulHoule 3y agoWhy free? The USPS doesn't deliver mail for free, instead it charges for stamps. There are people who think public transit should be free but others think that you're better off paying for it if it means there is more funding for a quality service. The last thing I'd want is a "free" service that sucks, I'd much rather pay for a quality service like Fastmail.
- c-linkage 3y agoOne pays for a post office box, so perhaps there is a similarity here I missed. But I was thinking it would be free to have but that maybe you would pay to send email.
- LinuxBender 3y agoinstead it charges for stamps Adding to that the USPS receive several billion in tax dollars every few years. It's not a consistent thing. During Covid they received $8.6B in tax dollars. A few years prior around 2015 they received $18B. In 2022 they received $50B. It happens when they go into a loss year. Their website says they are entirely self funded and I am not sure why they are permitted to say that. Maybe it's an accounting legalese thing.
- c-linkage 3y agoIncome from taxes was something I had thought of, but I didn't look up how much they actually receive. As you noted they claim to be self-funded. If taxes paid for a free email box would you use it?
- LinuxBender 3y agoIf taxes paid for a free email box would you use it? I can think of a specific use-case where this could make sense if done right. If I had a USPS managed secure email account that was documented in places such as the IRS, any federal or state medical benefits and they required client keys such as GPG/PGP for communication with the IRS, ID.me contractors, DoD / Military and other agencies then it might make sense, especially if they have extra validation steps for anything purporting to be from said agencies like deep chain validation of each transport layer and relay domain with approve-listed sending servers/domains per agency and a relationship with a large anti-fraud group that relentlessly pursues anyone trying to defraud an account holder. I think it would make sense to have a government validated email account for interactions with the government. The physical post offices should also be able to assist anyone with their issues with said account, including validating and documenting government ID's, resetting passwords and managing GPG keys.
- c-linkage 3y agoWould you want to be able to bring your own cryptographic keys? Or would post office provided keys work for you? Also, do you have any privacy concerns with a mailbox hosted by the post office?
- fragmede 3y agoI imagine the privacy concerns would be better with a government run post box vs by a corporation. Google doesn't need probable cause or a warrant to go snooping into your email, nor does UPS, FedEx, or DHL to go into your packages. The USPS does. Hence the secure option is to mail things via USPS. I'd imagine an email service by them to be similar.
- natecruft 3y agoNo. USPS is technically incompetent. Like, wow. They're remarkably good at keeping decades-old trucks running and at deciphering handwritten, mis-addressed labels, but that's because they've kept people with those skills on staff ... and nearly nobody else. USPS is already becoming an advertising company. "Marketing mail" is over 20% of revenue (FY 2022), but that doesn't include targeted (first class) ads nor resale (eg periodicals). And with the consistent push to "run it like a private business" (despite having both products and services effectively set by law), I can't see why they wouldn't scrape their email to generate revenue. There are many options between the extremes of ad-supported and self-hosting. The private sector fills that need, so the government need not step in.