Wow the quality of code comments is over the top! > If we ever do make it part of the API, we might want to rename it to something less funny like runUnsafe().

Wow the quality of code comments is over the top! > If we ever do make it part of the API, we might want to rename it to something less funny like runUnsafe(). I wonder, when you write that, why you wouldn't chose to rename it right away rather than using a funny name? Is it a strategy to avoid people using it? (runUnsafeAvoidUsing) or a strategy to make sure it doesn't get into the API? (wouldn't a flag or runUnsafeDontMakeItIntoTheApibe better )?