Clones can develop their own features and go their own way. I don't think calling something a clone is necessarily rude. At some point it will be significantl

Clones can develop their own features and go their own way. I don't think calling something a clone is necessarily rude. At some point it will be significantly different that it probably shouldn't be called a clone though, but if it currently has the same name as a feature in a pre-existing, popular software, "clone" seems like the right word. I imagine whomever built "bottles" (the clone, not the Crossover feature), probably used code, or at least was inspired by code, that CodeWeavers upstreamed to Wine.