4 ms·
They wouldn't make a more detailed manual for customers that they couldn't show to those customers. They do provide more detailed interface and system documenta
by nunuvit 3y ago
They wouldn't make a more detailed manual for customers that they couldn't show to those customers. They do provide more detailed interface and system documentation, but they don't share the restricted implementation details. Even for internal use, they'd want to confine the controlled information to a smaller subset of documents because otherwise it's difficult to circulate information.
- rtkwe 3y agoVery true. What I was saying was they probably couldn't provide what MrGilbert was maybe thinking this would because it would constitute restricted arms information. As neat as it would be to get some juicy details about the rocket even as it's being retired that info is very tightly regulated in most countries.
- nunuvit 3y agoGotcha. Most of the system-level information is under less restrictive control than ITAR or MTCR, but the effect is the same. Honestly though, the information isn't all that juicy. What most people would find interesting has been out there for a long time. The hardware in any rocket looks basically the same since Saturn V, and the only remarkable thing about the software is that it's organized. Is there anything you'd like me to point you to?