3 ms·
Since there are no tics on x-axis, it is not wrong. But I see your point.
by TZVdosOWs3kZHus 3y ago
Since there are no tics on x-axis, it is not wrong.
But I see your point.
- bunga-bunga 3y agoMathematically not wrong, but most definitely misleading/unethical. I don't think this was done unintentionally either, because the graph would still be perfectly readable without this change (as opposed to "a few points variation" where such zoom would be required) It's perfectly fine to display data this way, but they should make it clearer that the start isn't 0 by using wiggly lines or by labelling the origin.