4 ms·
The point we're responding to is this: > All of the commentary on the violation of the sterile cockpit rule and argument before departure are irrelevant to the
by spuz 3y ago
The point we're responding to is this:
> All of the commentary on the violation of the sterile cockpit rule and argument before departure are irrelevant to the actual cause
Which is just as false a statement as it is to say "The violation of the sterile cockpit rule and argument before departure were a significant cause". The fact is, we don't know if it was, but it's not wrong to say that it might be.
- refurb 3y agoIt’s not because we have experts at the NTSB to make a call as to relevance. You’re right it could be relevant, but they just didn’t have any data to support that. But you could also argue the copilot’s career as a lawyer could be relevant plus a million other factors, we just don’t know. It adds nothing to the discussion because it’s not actionable.