4 ms·
The issue is though that even with limited supply its really not a big deal for ISP's. Some have just turned to NAT as a cheap option. It sucks for consumers bu
by esskay 3y ago
The issue is though that even with limited supply its really not a big deal for ISP's. Some have just turned to NAT as a cheap option. It sucks for consumers but the ISP's dont care.
- Symbiote 3y agoNAT for an ISP isn't a cheap option -- they need expensive, stateful routers. IPv6 has one-off engineering costs to roll it out, but decreases ongoing costs for NAT.