3 ms·
Normally I'm not too cynical about politics (or most things), but in this case the policy was so obviously spectacularly bad that I find it hard to disagree. A
by arp242 3y ago
Normally I'm not too cynical about politics (or most things), but in this case the policy was so obviously spectacularly bad that I find it hard to disagree.
And to be very clear: an extremely expensive short-term half-arsed fix that doesn't do a single thing to fix any systemic issues (and, in fact, will likely make them worse) is profoundly bad policy, no matter what you think about education policy in general. I was very disappointed at all people in favour of this, as it's just so obviously the wrong approach to fix anything as we'll be in the same (or worse) situation in 10 to 15 years.
Fix college tuition fees first. Then you can start doing something about the existing debt if you want.
- landemva 3y agoWe could go back to pre-1998 and allow student loan debt to be discharged in bankruptcy. The law signed by Clinton was a gift to the banksters and college administrative head count. https://thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/economy-budget/283625-how-the-clinton-administration-made-it-harder-on-student/ https://thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/economy-budget/28362...