3 ms·
Indeed. "AI will only do the boiler-plate and crud, while us senior engineers won't be replaced any time soon". Sure, you get yours. But what about the next ge
by 3np 3y ago
Indeed. "AI will only do the boiler-plate and crud, while us senior engineers won't be replaced any time soon". Sure, you get yours.
But what about the next generation of devs and engineers - where do we source the senior engineers replacing us when 90+% of all entry-level and junior positions which actually involve writing repetitive boilerplate to a large extent are gone, and the few remaining are offshored and outsourced?
Many (most?) of us did a lot of automatable work in order to get the experience required to be able to proficiently actually automate the work, including managing LLM-generated code. If we replace our juniors with machines, we won't have many seniors down the road.
- Tainnor 3y agoWhy do junior engineers have to mostly write boilerplate code? Junior devs lack experience, not intelligence. It's fine to give them difficult problems, as long as they're supervised. I've worked with brilliant junior devs, sure, the code they wrote wasn't terribly idiomatic or maintainable, there were style issues, typical gotchas a more experienced programmer would be aware of etc., but it's not like they were fundamentally unable to solve a hard problem.