4 ms·
It doesn't sound like it. It just harvests the charge off the water particles. Imo this is interesting, but I'd expect there should be diminishing returns to
by dgoldstein0 3y ago
It doesn't sound like it. It just harvests the charge off the water particles.
Imo this is interesting, but I'd expect there should be diminishing returns to more layers of this in any one place - subject to airflow and current humidity at the least - there can only be so much charge on any particular set of water particles, and even if natural processes restore it they won't do so instantly.
The big question is, in a more optimized form of the device, whether the economics of such power generation are useful - how many $$ has to be spent to produce what sort of power output. It's an interesting proof of concept but without competitive economics for some use case, it is unlikely to see any notable adoption.
- taskforcegemini 3y agoif the idea doesn't work out in general, maybe it can still be used to make air dehumidifiers more efficient?
- mgerdts 3y ago> It doesn't sound like it. It just harvests the charge off the water particles. That’s what I thought as well, but they do talk about selection of materials to avoid wetting.