5 ms·
Yeah I'm setting up a Debian 12 Bookworm machine right now after ~13 years of being an Ubuntu user So far it's very snappy! My Ubuntu 18.04 machine somehow "r
by chubot 3y ago
Yeah I'm setting up a Debian 12 Bookworm machine right now after ~13 years of being an Ubuntu user
So far it's very snappy! My Ubuntu 18.04 machine somehow "rotted" in ways that previous installs didn't -- everything became slow and janky, sorta like Windows
And I specifically installed 18.04 in 2021, to avoid Snaps
But now it looks like Debian will work great
- phs 3y agoAs a stepping stone out of Ubuntu, Pop_OS! has been pleasant and snap-free.
- Uehreka 3y agoThe thought of people going to Pop to escape snap has me crackling.
- sigg3 3y agoTbf it doesn't default to the really slow snaps. Instead it defaults to the dreadfully slow flatpaks.
- Kbelicius 3y agoYou made this sound like snap is faster than flatpak. It isn't, unless something changed this year. Did something change?
- jzb 3y agoMy understanding is that Pop uses Flatpak sparingly, whereas Canonical is pushing Snaps for an increasing amount of software. That is, IIRC, you get (say) Firefox via Debs in Pop. Canonical wants to install it via Snap. IMO Flatpak is a great option for a set of desktop software where packaging across distros may be problematic for some reason. I use the Firefox Flatpak on Fedora / RHEL because it doesn't disable the video codecs, for instance. The native package doesn't have some codecs enabled. Canonical is (AIUI) pushing Snap for desktop and server software. And Canonical is the only source of Snaps, I believe? With Flatpak you get Flathub but AFAIK anybody could set up a repo of Flatpaks.
- pxc 3y agoFlatpaks have some startup time penalty, but it's an order of magnitude better than Snaps. They also have way better disk usage characteristics per installed package than Snaps do (they scale better). You can use them side-by-side on the same system. Install a dozen of each and take some measurements.
- comprev 3y agoThat gave me a chuckle while eating my morning cereal. Very good! :-) For those who don't get the reference: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snap,_Crackle_and_Pop https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snap,_Crackle_and_Pop
- jzb 3y agoTook me a minute. Well done.
- lproven 3y agoI have tried it, and reviewed it. I kinda like the window tiling, but it's still GNOME and GNOME is still a pain. As a cleaned-up Ubuntu, I like Zinc. https://teejeetech.com/2022/05/07/zinc-22-04/ https://teejeetech.com/2022/05/07/zinc-22-04/ Ubuntu, with the smallest cleanest but richest desktop on Linux -- Xfce -- and neither Snap nor Flatpak. Instead, `deb-get` which finds and installs native DEB packages, configures the repos for you, manages updates and so on.
- teekert 3y agoI was on KDE for a bit, love it on my ultrawide monitor with tiling. But on my laptop Gnome is so sweat. I have a 2nd hand HP ProBook and I swear, for the very first time ever in my Linux life the trackpad feels like my MacBook trackpad. 3 fingers swipe up, overview of windows, another swipe is app grid, swipe left right, move to other desktops. I really find the whole experience very smooth and I enjoy it a lot (all Wayland, on NixOS). I have suspend/wake working well so far, USB-C charging + screen + all peripherals via 1 USB-C cable, all "media" buttons work. And this is still on 8 GB of ram (soon the 2x32 GB will arrive ;)), I haven't even heard the fans so far! I'm on Teams, camera works, nobody would even know I'm on Linux if it wasn't for my constant evangelizing! I'm really impressed (yeah, I know, Linux people easily are when it comes to desktops, basically we're impressed if things work). I did enable AppIndicator. Solaar, NextCloud and Tailscale all really require it to be considered functional. I don't understand why that is not a standard thing (it is on many distros though).
- lproven 3y ago> Gnome is so sweat ... Sweet? I don't like GNOME. I don't like GNOME accessories; I hate CSD and hamburger menus and that big empty wasted top panel. I want more things vertical, while GNOME is moving its vertical workspace-switcher to horizontal. The Cosmic tiling is good. That's an improvement. GNOME's window management sucks, and this is better. I also really don't like systemd-boot and it broke one of my laptops severely. So, I am happy that it is good for you, but it is not something I'd choose.
- 3y ago
- cies 3y agoI will use them, at least for a while, when their currently in development Rust desktop env is out. Super curious how that pans out (as traditionally all popular GUI libs are very OO). https://github.com/pop-os/cosmic-epoch https://github.com/pop-os/cosmic-epoch https://github.com/pop-os/libcosmic https://github.com/pop-os/libcosmic https://github.com/iced-rs/iced https://github.com/iced-rs/iced
- petre 3y agoI had numerous issues with it, like the inputs would not focus in firefox-esr. Unfortunately I had to install Ubuntu 22.04 which works fine but has all sorts of annoyances like snaps and text ads in apt. Ubuntu didn't even set up grub right after I used custom partitioning to avoid nuking my /home partition, it only booted after I did a manual grub-install.
- pmontra 3y agoI switched to Debian 11 for the same reasons around Christmas. I also found out faster than Ubuntu 20.04 and the fan starts spinning less often. I've been on Ubuntu since 8.04. When I can I'm creating servers with Debian too, personal ones and for customers. The only problem there is that Letsencrypt uses a snap to update the certificates, even on Debian [1]. Not all my servers need a web server but when they do I usually use ngnix. I'm investigating alternative update clients with no hurry. When that is solved, goodbye to Ubuntu. [1] https://certbot.eff.org/instructions?ws=nginx&os=debianbuster&commit=%3E https://certbot.eff.org/instructions?ws=nginx&os=debianbuste...
- vidarh 3y agoIf you pick "pip" instead of a specific Linux distro it gives you instructions without a snap.
- pmontra 3y agoI'm afraid that this is only a wrapper around the snap. I quote from that page > If you have any Certbot packages installed using an OS package manager like apt, dnf, or yum, you should remove them before installing the Certbot snap to ensure that when you run the command certbot the snap is used rather than the installation from your OS package manager.
- Gabrys1 3y agoThat doesn't mean the other means wrap snap. It just means in order to truly install via snap, you should remove the same package installed via other means before
- vidarh 3y agoThat seems to be a doc issue. It certainly did not install a snap when I just tested this, and the certpot python package it installs explicitly checks to see whether it is running in a snap or not, which would make no sense if running it outside wasn't an option.
- 3y ago
- reidrac 3y agoI did the same by the time Jessie was released. I realised the XFCE version was good enough, and I could use a few tools from the vendor binaries plus a couple of things I could compile. Yes, it is more work, but since then I've been upgrading Debian and it just gets better!
- znpy 3y agoDid the same ubuntu > debian transition a while ago… but then got fed up with old packages and other stuff. Nowadays I’m on fedora (xfce spin) and it’s just perfect.
- npteljes 3y agoI'm in literally the same boat, on Debian now because of snaps. Their other homegrown stuff were mostly out of the way, like Unity or upstart, but snap was just really annoying with how it's integrated into the system.
- cies 3y agoOn OpenSuSE Tumbleweed now because of Snap, rolling releases, best of class KDE support and pretty good testing of packages.
- vladvasiliu 3y ago> My Ubuntu 18.04 machine somehow "rotted" in ways that previous installs didn't -- everything became slow and janky, sorta like Windows Oh man, this reminds me of two years ago. During Covid lockdowns, I figured I'd try Ubuntu, see what's up with gnome. This was 20.04. I was pretty meh, but it was okay. Then I found out about Regolith [0], which is a "spin" or whatever it's called, that comes with i3 (like Kubuntu has KDE instead of Gnome). I don't know exactly why, and I was too lazy to dig, but that thing was one of the most sluggish experiences I've ever had. At the time, I'd daily drive an i5-6500 with integrated graphics, and my regular Arch with i3 and light Picom effects (blurring for notifications and dimming inactive windows) worked great on the integrated GPU. Somehow, the Ubuntu version was worse on a newer i5-8500. [0] https://regolith-desktop.com/ https://regolith-desktop.com/