>However, various emails show Plaintiffs are likely to succeed on the merits through evidence that the motivation of the NIAID Defendants was a “take down” of p

>However, various emails show Plaintiffs are likely to succeed on the merits through evidence that the motivation of the NIAID Defendants was a “take down” of protected free speech. Dr. Francis Collins, in an email to Dr. Fauci told Fauci there needed to be a “quick and devastating take down” of the GBD—the result was exactly that. What an utterly horrendous misrepresentation of this email by the judge, who seemingly edited it to fit his narrative. Here's the full sentence[0]: >there needs to be a quick and devastating published takedown of its premises. I don't see anything like that online yet - is it underway? So clearly referring to 'takedown' in the sense of a published rebuttal, not an instruction to social media companies to remove content. Notice how he ommitted the word 'published' from his quote. This does not inspire confidence. [0]https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2021/12/18/23/51969841-10324873-image-a-3_1639871403560.jpg https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2021/12/18/23/51969841-10324873...