3 ms·
For me, in the context of the climate change discussion, I knew exactly what it was trying to communicate. I did not find it particularly sensationalized. > Wo
by comfypotato 3y ago
For me, in the context of the climate change discussion, I knew exactly what it was trying to communicate. I did not find it particularly sensationalized.
> Would love to see a source for that.
False. If you’d love to you would have at least given it a quick Google and found plenty of relevant papers.
There are thousands of studies that would communicate what I just said with a basic Google Scholar search.
If you’re a climate change denier just say that so we can move on with our lives.
- rfdsaljfds 3y ago[flagged]
- comfypotato 3y agoYour tone is out of line with HN guidelines. Emotionally laden, sure. But it’s not garbage. Our inhabitation is sustainable in part because of sensational climate science. It plays an important role in keeping our effect on the planet in check. As far as you not finding a source: it doesn’t surprise me. With your attitude, you’ll never find anything. I did a quick search as a sanity check and the first hit (just Google, not Google Scholar even) had exactly what I would send you if this argument was worth my time.
- rfdsaljfds 3y ago[flagged]