3 ms·
Well, "rude" is the clear winner, with 54 occurrences (and one "intentionally rude"). Runners-up: harsh 21 ("overly harsh": 2; "t
by thaumaturgy 15y ago
Well, "rude" is the clear winner, with 54 occurrences (and one "intentionally rude"). Runners-up:
harsh 21 ("overly harsh": 2; "too harsh: 1)
negative 13 ("unduly negative": 1; "completely negative": 1; "overly negative": 2; "negative Nancy": 2; "too negative": 2; "totally negative": 2; "intentionally negative": 1)
snarky 12
overly critical 11 ("too critical": 3; "critical": 3)
Other common phrases:
an ass 8
pedantic 8
argumentative 8
insulting 6
a downer 6 ("(a) Debbie Downer": 2; "down": 1)
dismissive 6
flippant 6 ("flip": 3)
offensive 7 ("blatantly offensive": 1)
cynical 5 ("overly cynical": 1)
condescending 5
glib 5
a jerk 5
mean 4
pessimistic 4 ("overly pessimistic": 1)
that guy 4
crass 3
curt 3
a hater 3
disrespectful 3
patronizing 3
presumptuous 3
nit-picky / nitpicky 3
Terms that were only used twice: obnoxious, picky, insensitive ("culturally insensitive": 1), discouraging, crude, impolite, preachy, a tease, adversarial, coy.
HN has quite the vocabulary. There's a long tail of single occurrences: meta (ed: ha-ha), naive, cheeky, shortsighted, dumb, hasty, racist (ed: surprising!), stuffy, demeaning, snide, dense, nasty, personal, unhelpful, contrary, contentious, fanboyish, cold, doom-and-gloom, frivolous, facile, accusatory, callous, lame, inflammatory, hating, ironic, skeptical, trolling, trollish, patronizing, spiteful, sexist, disagreeable, controversial, simple, overly reductionist, hard on Aussies (ed: chuckle), antagonistic, off-topic, crabby, crude, derogative (ed: think they meant derogatory), passing absolute judgement, an idiot, an alarmist, an insensitive dick, a curmudgeon, an HN curmudgeon, a troll, a jackass, a tweak, a word Nazi (ed: surely not), a grumpy gus, a dick, a total dick, a stickler, a hardass, a killjoy, a huge downer, a turd, a burden, the grumpy skeptic ...
...and my personal favorite:
"the next snarky Lisp guy in the room".
There were about 7 other things roughly fitting the pattern here, but not quite within the spirit of the rest: e.g., "trashing Ballmer", or "overly favorable towards Google".
Quoted text was ignored where possible; instances of "or", as in, "insensitive or rude", counted as a point for each, except for "or anything", which was ignored. Terms were very lightly massaged, for example, "so callous" would have counted simply as "callous".
- zlapper 15y agoGreat job! May I ask how do you get to produce these kind of analysis? Thank you!
- thaumaturgy 15y agoSure, but I'm afraid it'll be disappointing: I just used pen and paper. It was a good pen, though. :-)
- fjw 15y agoIf anyone here is enrolled in Udacity's CS101 class, this actually seems like a good extension/application for what the class is currently teaching, ie using Python's find method to search for URLs and using indices to return a string that follows "I don't mean to be". There are probably much better ways to collect this data, but I thought this was a relevant and interesting connection.
- jmilloy 15y agoOf course, there is general English idiom and mimicry in play here... I typed a few into google and looked at the number of results to get a very rough sense of how hn differs from the norm. For example, "... pedantic" is (unsurprisingly) up on hn but "... critical" is down. rude 17.2m harsh 2.1m negative 1.8m snarky 0.17m critical 5.0m an ass 0.45m pedantic 0.15m argumentative 0.29m