4 ms·
> His formula was, in a nutshell: Create training courses and sell them to others, just as he was doing. And at least one of us made big money (hint, it wasn’t
by sshine 3y ago
> His formula was, in a nutshell: Create training courses and sell them to others, just as he was doing. And at least one of us made big money (hint, it wasn’t me).
There is something special about courses about getting rich by making training courses about anything non-self-referential that attracts a lot more suckers than the “real” training courses.
- doubled112 3y agoAny get rich quick scheme is probably a scam. If it was as easy as, say, follow this formula, wouldn't we all be rich? Instead, to get rich quick, it is likely best to prey on people who are probably already broke and desperate, but we can't all be sociopaths.
- sshine 3y agoYou don't have to be a sociopath to fall for this. "Make online learning material about stuff you know" doesn't seem like a shady endeavour. It is a very recommendable activity, especially if you happen to like teaching. But I would never bet on getting rich from doing it. I think it's only borderline scammy; game-theoretically you can say that it's a losing game for certain parties, but I don't think that makers of the kinds of learning material that is profitable are evil, just because it's profitable for recursive reasons. From their perspective they're just having luck because everyone wants to know how to make videos, how to talk, how to structure things, and what sites pay well. It's like drop-shipping: This is a great idea if it weren't because the profit margins get eradicated by everone doing it. Some cities arose around healing springs; the traffic alone could sustain roadside businesses that eventually formed cities. Maybe the spring didn't cure cancer, but does that make the roadside hotdog vendor shady?