3 ms·
I am all for cleaning up the advertisement everywhere. That said, I am not sure the article convinced me with the conclusions drawn. > Despite the forebodings,
by WaitWaitWha 3y ago
I am all for cleaning up the advertisement everywhere. That said, I am not sure the article convinced me with the conclusions drawn.
> Despite the forebodings, São Paulo’s economy didn’t run aground ...
All those advertising business are now defunct. That is a significant impact to those companies and 20,000 employees. It is disingenuous to write "20,000 people would lose jobs", then flip and say the entire city "economy didn't run aground".
> Unexpectedly, the removal of logos and slogans exposed previously overlooked architecture, revealing a rich urban beauty that had been long hidden.
Personally I am not seeing that much "rich urban beauty". Definitely there are some buildings of architectural significance, but vast majority of the buildings are not.
Again, I like the idea of advertisement reduced to a minimum, but let's be honest of the outcomes.
- kevincox 3y ago> That is a significant impact to those companies and 20,000 employees. I would rather that we don't pay people to perform harmful activities. I understand that it is awful to lose your job but I think we should target that rather than keep them working harmful jobs just so that they can live an acceptable live. If we had high quality social safety nets than it would be an inconvenience but manageable. I would rather pay these people to have a comfortable life or find a new job.
- anigbrowl 3y agoThat is a significant impact to those companies and 20,000 employees. Good, they were making money off information pollution and psychological manipulation.