5 ms·
they do if they don't want a user's ISP to inject ads or modify content in transit. this does happen
by naikrovek 3y ago
they do if they don't want a user's ISP to inject ads or modify content in transit.
this does happen
- bmacho 3y agoJust make it illegal (I think it already is on most of the world), problem solved.
- naikrovek 3y agoyou're right. making an activity illegal always stops it.
- bmacho 3y agoI don't remember saying that, or anything close to it? If the law forbids ISPs to show ads or modify the content in any way, then they won't do it.
- pixl97 3y agoNo what you stated was "take money out of politics" which is going to be far more difficult then the technical issues we're presented with. Why that statement, because any law to ban ISPs from doing this will be met with millions in political investment by said ISPs to prevent it. Since the average person doesn't care about this issue it's a losing proposition.
- davewiner 3y agoi'm not going to re-do all the sites i did in the 90s, 00s, 10s. never going to happen.
- naikrovek 3y agoI'm not asking you to
- nlewycky 3y agoCould you elaborate? I thought upgrading to HTTPS wouldn't involve redoing any sites, no changes to the HTML/CSS/JS/server side code, except for the TLS configuration and maybe replacing links from "http:" to "https:" but that's optional. I'd like to hear how it requires redoing a website?
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]