4 ms·
It’s a lot of emotional arguments without any technical substance. I agree that for personal static information HTTP is good enough. Another good use case is th
by pietro72ohboy 3y ago
It’s a lot of emotional arguments without any technical substance. I agree that for personal static information HTTP is good enough. Another good use case is the usage of HTTP for distribution of update packages for distorts like Debian since the OS can validate those packages using signatures. Other than that, HTTPS does make the web more secure and I don’t see a reason to rally against its widespread adoption.
- _9hey 3y agoIt's not an argument against HTTPS, it's an argument to protect the relics of the past. Google doesn't provide access to results past the first 5 pages or so anyways, they have a track record for destroying the internet.