Depends what kind of passthrough you’re talking about. If you’re talking about additive displays like xreal , magic lens or HoloLens, then the Vision Pro has a

Depends what kind of passthrough you’re talking about. If you’re talking about additive displays like xreal , magic lens or HoloLens, then the Vision Pro has a much higher field of view of the content and the ability to display things that are darker than the real world , in exchange for looking at a screen of the world instead of directly at it. Those trade offs are subjective so I won’t focus on them because the tech is so different. If you compare to other VR headsets with cameras feeding video to the screen, there’s a lot: 1. Clarity is higher. If you look at the footage from their product video which they said is shot from device, it’s a lot more stable and clear than anything up until you get to the $6k Varjo XR-3. 2. Latency is lower apparently. Most other headsets have more of a delay between photon in to photon out based on people who’ve tried it. 3. Better reprojection of the image. If you look at videos of pass through from the Quest Pro, as you move, things warp in the view. From videos from the vision pro, it doesn’t seem to have any of that. (Obviously I’m just taking each company at its word that videos are honest) Supposedly the Quest 3 is significantly better passthrough than the Quest Pro but very few people have tried it and said anything in depth about it, so it’s too early to judge.