4 ms·
I’d take ugly street art over ugly advertisement. At least it’s not trying to manipulate you.
by tobr 3y ago
I’d take ugly street art over ugly advertisement. At least it’s not trying to manipulate you.
- hu3 3y agoThat's false dichotomy. We don't need to choose between two uglies. I'd rather have none.
- tobr 3y agoI’ll take beautiful street art over beautiful advertisements for the same reason, for what it’s worth.
- kattagarian 3y agoat least advertisement is not made on the wall of your house without your consent
- input_sh 3y agoYeah, but it's thrown inside my mailbox without my consent instead.
- tobr 3y agoDo you think everyone who lives in a house with a billboard on it are asked to OK the ads?
- lostlogin 3y agoWhere do lit up displays fit in? Glaring, bright screens with moving images which are visible for miles.
- tchaffee 3y agoMuch of the graffiti in São Paulo is with the consent of the building owners. Some even pay for it.
- raverbashing 3y ago"try to manipulate me" Not sure if it's manipulation, but I certainly put my consideration for taggers between that of cockroaches and flatworms when I see one of those