4 ms·
Street photography does not have to be in the street. The name never really had a mandatorily fixed connection to the practical expressions of the genre, or the
by daneel_w 3y ago
Street photography does not have to be in the street. The name never really had a mandatorily fixed connection to the practical expressions of the genre, or the artistic phenomenon that it is. It's about moments in passing, casual observations etc. I write this (and previous comments) as someone with a profound love for photography and that genre in particular, not as someone throwing random guesses. But thank you for the quip retort.
- throwaway290 3y agoSorry. You are talking about some kind of photography where "definition" is important. I am not talking about that kind of photography. I am talking about the kind of photography for which people use cheap film cameras, expired film, disposable cameras, cheap digital compacts. "Definition" is of very little importance. > Street photography does not have to be in the street. Well that's another can of worms I guess. People tagging random non-street shots as street photography is my personal pet peeve...