4 ms·

I prefer the NASA approach: 100% is whatever as defined in the spec sheet, and any improvements above that are measured in percentages above 100. As an example

I prefer the NASA approach: 100% is whatever as defined in the spec sheet, and any improvements above that are measured in percentages above 100. As an example, the SSME was nominally operated at 104.5%, and the newer expendable RS-25Es nominally operate at 111%.[1] So basically: 100% is the CPU running at base frequency, and anything higher (eg: turboing/boosting, overclocking) should result in even higher percentages above 100. This would be a lot more meaningful than whatever "100% CPU load" means today. [1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RS-25#Engine_throttle/output https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RS-25#Engine_throttle/output

mjevans 3y ago
That's mostly what I stated, though with adjustable frequency products like CPUs and GPUs the question of 'what is the base frequency' is also a question. That's why I carefully phrased around manufacturer's claimed continuous operation in the worst environment supported spec. (Though implicitly with adequate cooling operating, not obviously broken cases like a CPU with it's heat sink shaken off.)