3 ms·
It’s like two dudes developing the solution and more importantly, charging you for it. If you don’t see the radical difference in incentive structures, then I d
by aerhardt 3y ago
It’s like two dudes developing the solution and more importantly, charging you for it. If you don’t see the radical difference in incentive structures, then I don’t know what to tell you.
- j-a-a-p 3y agoSorry, had a bit of time left today. Its more like 7 dudes, and their whole proposition is underwhelming TBH. Mostly gratuite statements against the ruling order. Half their website is a rant against the 'capitalist' competition. And the whole Christmas tree of doing good is exposed. But nothing really sticks: - Simple and easy: wait until the product matures - Open source: but no foundational governance, like Apache for example. - Promise never to sell to investors, but nothing is in place to actually prevent that from happening. Note this common practice via a social enterprise. - 45 kg reduction of CO2 compared to Google per average website(!): clear violation of EU law (2006/114/EG) in my opinion. - They suggest to proxy their service to circumvent consumers who actively block traffic to plausible. This is OK, because they are good.[0] [0] https://plausible.io/docs/proxy/introduction https://plausible.io/docs/proxy/introduction