3 ms·
Midjourney solution: "--no bunch, two, multiple": https://i.imgur.com/QnJmLr0.jpeg https://i.imgur.com/QnJmLr0.jpeg These models have a tendency to move toward
by anotheryou 3y ago
Midjourney solution: "--no bunch, two, multiple": https://i.imgur.com/QnJmLr0.jpeg https://i.imgur.com/QnJmLr0.jpeg
These models have a tendency to move towards the average, especially if unprompted. As we see here, sometimes even if prompted otherwise.
They just have to get better or need a more precise interface like the —no :). We also couldn't have "a man crawling" before and now we can: https://i.imgur.com/ycVpk3i.jpeg https://i.imgur.com/ycVpk3i.jpeg
- RugnirViking 3y ago--no is too strong, it ruins the quality because of negative weight pollution. Something like :: bunch, two, multiple::-0.3 would probably be enough without making them look worse
- jonplackett 3y agoThey don't really look like bananas anymore though...
- anotheryou 3y agofirst one is fine. And I could do it more carefully :) Adjusted and with help of the other commenter°: https://i.imgur.com/e2aE1bQ.jpeg https://i.imgur.com/e2aE1bQ.jpeg And you always have some crap generations :) ° https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36584831 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36584831
- dafoex 3y agoI agree. While the article is correct that this problem of subtle bias exists, the solution for most cases is to realise that the computer "does what you say, not what you mean".