4 ms·

Yes advertising restrictions for tobacco companies but there is no need to produce a govt ID when purchasing vapes, booze or cigs. You just walk up and the cas

Yes advertising restrictions for tobacco companies but there is no need to produce a govt ID when purchasing vapes, booze or cigs. You just walk up and the cashier eyeballs you and if you an obvious minor but then you get a friend that plays sports to buy it - just seem like a silly liability waiver for not getting sued when Timmy DUI's and wipes out somebody.

badpun 3y ago
> Yes advertising restrictions for tobacco companies but there is no need to produce a govt ID when purchasing vapes, booze or cigs. What country do you have in mind specifically? I live in a non-puritan country (Poland) and we absolutely need to produce the ID.
- throwaway98721 3y ago
  You live in the most puritan country in EU. Polish women have to illegally (because your country made it illegal for pregnant women) cross borders to have medically necessary abortions and then they will be persecuted if they return. Anyways, I never had to produce ID when I bought alcohol and cigarettes while I visited Poland.
  - badpun 3y ago
    Please read what Purtanism is, before you start talking about it. E.g. here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Puritans https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Puritans (short version - puritanism was a movement that orignated on the British Isles, and spread to the US from there. It never ever made it to Poland). As for the original issue - once it's visibly obvious that you're over 18, nobody asks you to produce your ID. The only exceptions are automated (self-service) tills.
    - deleted 3y ago
      [deleted]
    - deleted 3y ago
      [deleted]
    - deleted 3y ago
      [deleted]
    - throwaway98721 3y ago
      Notice that I said "puritan", not "Puritan" - "puritan" usually doesn't mean anything directly connected to the Puritans in modern discourse. Check the dictionary. It has a generalized primary meaning today. And your country is the definition of it (of course, also not literally). From your link: "Puritanism was never a formally defined religious division within Protestantism, and the term Puritan itself was rarely used after the turn of the 18th century." - that makes it extremely unlikely I meant it literally, don't you think? As for the original issue - I wasn't over 18 back then and it was very visible.

badpun 3y ago

> Yes advertising restrictions for tobacco companies but there is no need to produce a govt ID when purchasing vapes, booze or cigs. What country do you have in mind specifically? I live in a non-puritan country (Poland) and we absolutely need to produce the ID.

throwaway98721 3y ago
You live in the most puritan country in EU. Polish women have to illegally (because your country made it illegal for pregnant women) cross borders to have medically necessary abortions and then they will be persecuted if they return. Anyways, I never had to produce ID when I bought alcohol and cigarettes while I visited Poland.
- badpun 3y ago
  Please read what Purtanism is, before you start talking about it. E.g. here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Puritans https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Puritans (short version - puritanism was a movement that orignated on the British Isles, and spread to the US from there. It never ever made it to Poland). As for the original issue - once it's visibly obvious that you're over 18, nobody asks you to produce your ID. The only exceptions are automated (self-service) tills.
  - deleted 3y ago
    [deleted]
  - deleted 3y ago
    [deleted]
  - deleted 3y ago
    [deleted]
  - throwaway98721 3y ago
    Notice that I said "puritan", not "Puritan" - "puritan" usually doesn't mean anything directly connected to the Puritans in modern discourse. Check the dictionary. It has a generalized primary meaning today. And your country is the definition of it (of course, also not literally). From your link: "Puritanism was never a formally defined religious division within Protestantism, and the term Puritan itself was rarely used after the turn of the 18th century." - that makes it extremely unlikely I meant it literally, don't you think? As for the original issue - I wasn't over 18 back then and it was very visible.