I won't comment again on my support for these laws for obvious reasons but I will say that the laws are just democracy in action and the residents of those stat

I won't comment again on my support for these laws for obvious reasons but I will say that the laws are just democracy in action and the residents of those states are either getting their wishes done or this will help fix whatever corruption there is. PH and others declining to comply is a good thing too, that's what both sides wanted apparently. In some countries I have been to, even google and bing are very aggressive at removing any result that could remotely be considered adult content. My understanding is that the whole point of federally structured statehood is for each state to do unpopular things like this and people move to where they want. The one thing that should change is for the federal government to stop supporting states unfairly. The federal tax revenue and population of a state should be the deciding factor on how much money and infrastructure support states get. For example, internet access itself should be state subsidized not federal. the federal government by law should force states to support its policies like this if it means subsidies and investments like rural interner access. The price for being left alone while they ban books an random things for their politics should be having to pull their weight. For conservative states like missisipi and arkansas that are dirt poor, they should look to texas and florida who are capable of pulling their weight while coming up with crazy laws. The only serious matter of contention is immigration which I won't touch with a 10-ft pole now.