4 ms·
You're ignoring the concept of disparate impact. A facially neutral criteria can still be illegal discrimination if it has a disproportionate adverse effect on
by TheCoelacanth 3y ago
You're ignoring the concept of disparate impact. A facially neutral criteria can still be illegal discrimination if it has a disproportionate adverse effect on a protected class. Lack of intent is not a get-out-of-jail-free card.
Grades might fall into that category except that they have a demonstrable connection to the student's academic abilities. It would be much harder to prove a connection for who the student happens to be related to.
- reaperman 3y agoI’m not sure they personally ignore it, so much as predict that the Supreme Court majority will ignore it.