2 ms·
I feel this example points to a key issue regarding LLM AI. I've read the work on AI story generation from early days to now, and GPT-4's output shows a jump in
by wrp 3y ago
I feel this example points to a key issue regarding LLM AI. I've read the work on AI story generation from early days to now, and GPT-4's output shows a jump in performance that leaves me both elated and dismayed. The fluency and coherence of the generated narrative is incredible, frankly better than most student writing. On the other hand, I get an overwhelming sense of banality. Looking back on historical speculation about AI, I think there was always a tacit assumption that facility for communication would develop on top of facility for incisive reasoning. Fluency without insight was not expected.
- TedDoesntTalk 3y agoYou didn’t mention creativity (or lack of it). Is it ironic that the overall lesson is “human judgment and intervention” are important, or maybe it just lifted that from the original movie.
- DropInIn 3y agoPeople ascribe way too much non-programatic nature to humans imo Just look up the Name a Color and a Tool question Did you think of one? Red hammer? Or blue screwdriver?
- wholinator2 3y agohmmm, I chose a yellow saw
- DropInIn 3y agohttps://mentalismguide.com/red-hammer-trick https://mentalismguide.com/red-hammer-trick
- mquander 3y agoThe examples you're looking at are coming from systems that have undergone long courses of reinforcement learning specifically teaching them to be banal.