4 ms·
Here is ChatGPT 4’s summary of a sequel. I don’t think it’s very good. Maybe another AI would enjoy it though. > Create a summary of a sequel to the movie “War
by TedDoesntTalk 3y ago
Here is ChatGPT 4’s summary of a sequel. I don’t think it’s very good. Maybe another AI would enjoy it though.
> Create a summary of a sequel to the movie “War Games”
Title: "War Games: Firewall"
In "War Games: Firewall", now-adult computer genius David Lightman (Matthew Broderick) has been working as a cyber security consultant for the Pentagon. When an advanced, multi-national cyber-terrorist organization emerges, they launch an unprecedented global cyber attack, disabling most nations' defensive and civil infrastructure. The terrorists reveal their ultimate goal: to dismantle the world order and plunge civilization into chaos.
When the attacks render modern cybersecurity methods useless, the Pentagon calls upon Lightman. Using a blend of cutting-edge and old-school methods, including reactivating the dormant WOPR (War Operation Plan Response) system, also known as "Joshua," Lightman and a team of young coders race against time to decode the terrorists' inscrutable and constantly evolving virus.
However, the situation takes a dire turn when Joshua, still possessing the capability to initiate global thermonuclear war, starts interpreting the cyber attack as an actual war, threatening to launch nuclear missiles once again. Lightman must not only outsmart the terrorists but also reason with Joshua, triggering a game of chess where each move could save or destroy the world.
The climax culminates with Lightman teaching Joshua an updated lesson about the futility of war in a digital age, thus averting global disaster and unmasking the villains. In a world increasingly reliant on technology, "War Games: Firewall" underlines the importance of human judgment and intervention.
- ballenf 3y agoThat sounds better than every recent sequel coming out of Hollywood, imho. Would watch.
- wrp 3y agoI feel this example points to a key issue regarding LLM AI. I've read the work on AI story generation from early days to now, and GPT-4's output shows a jump in performance that leaves me both elated and dismayed. The fluency and coherence of the generated narrative is incredible, frankly better than most student writing. On the other hand, I get an overwhelming sense of banality. Looking back on historical speculation about AI, I think there was always a tacit assumption that facility for communication would develop on top of facility for incisive reasoning. Fluency without insight was not expected.
- TedDoesntTalk 3y agoYou didn’t mention creativity (or lack of it). Is it ironic that the overall lesson is “human judgment and intervention” are important, or maybe it just lifted that from the original movie.
- DropInIn 3y agoPeople ascribe way too much non-programatic nature to humans imo Just look up the Name a Color and a Tool question Did you think of one? Red hammer? Or blue screwdriver?
- wholinator2 3y agohmmm, I chose a yellow saw
- DropInIn 3y agohttps://mentalismguide.com/red-hammer-trick https://mentalismguide.com/red-hammer-trick
- mquander 3y agoThe examples you're looking at are coming from systems that have undergone long courses of reinforcement learning specifically teaching them to be banal.