I don't think it makes much sense to compare a fiction book to a non-fiction book. There's not enough points of comparison. While both can be compared on qualit

I don't think it makes much sense to compare a fiction book to a non-fiction book. There's not enough points of comparison. While both can be compared on quality of prose, the fiction might be judged on characters and plot, and the non-fiction book on accuracy and detail. You might as well ask the question: Who is the better Tennis player? Roger Federer or Garry Kasparov? A system would need to draw some kind of boundary conditions so you are comparing things that have more in common than "printed on paper and bound".