What do you mean, you haven't seen anything else like it? At least O(100) people are working full-time on research programs trying to mitigate AI x-risks. The w

What do you mean, you haven't seen anything else like it? At least O(100) people are working full-time on research programs trying to mitigate AI x-risks. The whole founding team of Anthropic left OpenAI to do their own thing specifically because they thought that's what they needed to do to pursue their safety agenda. Isn't that taking the problem at least as seriously as quitting a job at Google? It sounds like you think that the main way to act on a concern is by making a maximum amount of noise about it. But another way to act on a concern is to try to solve it. Up until very recently, the population of people who perceive the risk are mostly engineers and scientists, not politicians or journalists, so they are naturally inclined towards the latter approach. In the end, if people aren't putting their money (really or metaphorically) where their mouth is, you can accuse them of not really caring, and if people are putting their money where their mouth is, then you can accuse them of just talking their book. So reasoning from whether they are acting exactly how you think they should, is not going to be a good way to figure out how right they are or aren't.