4 ms·
macOS will render at the next highest integer scale factor and then downscale to fit the resolution of your monitor instead of just rendering at the fractional
by xnyanta 3y ago
macOS will render at the next highest integer scale factor and then downscale to fit the resolution of your monitor instead of just rendering at the fractional scale in the first place
- Aaargh20318 3y agoIt’s effectively supersampling. The resulting image looks excellent.
- hocuspocus 3y agoThere are several scenarios where it clearly doesn't look that good, and where Windows objectively does a much better job. Most people (and companies) aren't willing to spend $1600 on Apple's 5K monitor, so they get a good 27" UHD monitor instead, and they soon realize macOS either gives you pixel perfect rendering at a 2x scale factor which corresponds to a ridiculously small 1920x1080 viewport, or a blurry 2560x1440 equivalent.
- Aaargh20318 3y agoThe 2560x1440 equivalent looks tack sharp on macOS. It renders at 5120x2880 and scales it down to native, as I said it’s effectively supersampling. I used this for years and never experienced a blurry image. I now run a 5k2k monitor, also at a fractional scale and again it looks excellent.
- manderley 3y agoIt very obviously is blurry, though. There's a reason so many people notice this issue, you're not going to be able to explain it away.
- Aaargh20318 3y agoI have eyes, and recently updated subscription glasses, I can see what it looks like and it’s tack sharp. Are you sure you aren’t confusing Window’s terrible font rendering with sharpness?
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- duskwuff 3y agoDoes macOS support any scaling factors above 2x?