4 ms·
I'm thinking, what if someone would add in their blog's terms of use something like "the content on this blog is not for machine learning purposes"? Could they
by yonatan8070 3y ago
I'm thinking, what if someone would add in their blog's terms of use something like "the content on this blog is not for machine learning purposes"? Could they later sue Google if their site gets scraped by Google for LLM training?
- omoikane 3y agoIf those terms of use were machine readable, this would have been equivalent to something like robots.txt, but for AI. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34324208 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34324208 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35886288 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35886288
- anotherman554 3y agoA contract requires an agreement between two parties. I don't see how writing "the content on this blog is not for machine learning purposes" alone shows Google has agreed to your terms.
- hbn 3y agoNext you're gonna tell me the copy-paste Facebook statuses that say Facebook doesn't have rights to your photos don't do anything!
- spaced-out 3y agoThe US Supreme Court has already said no, see the case of LinkedIn vs. HiQ. https://www.fbm.com/publications/what-recent-rulings-in-hiq-v-linkedin-and-other-cases-say-about-the-legality-of-data-scraping/ https://www.fbm.com/publications/what-recent-rulings-in-hiq-...