4 ms·
To try to prevent others from joining this argument: twitter is currently not allowing you to read tweets without being logged in. Hence, it can be both availab
by vGPU 3y ago
To try to prevent others from joining this argument: twitter is currently not allowing you to read tweets without being logged in. Hence, it can be both available and not available.
- lopkeny12ko 3y ago[flagged]
- Percent1361 3y ago[flagged]
- dang 3y agoThat's far from true and simply indicates the direction (and intensity) of your own political passions. This is one of the most reliable phenomena on HN: everyone thinks their team is the one being repressed. People with opposite passions think the site is overrun by your team and that the mods are in your pocket. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26148870 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26148870 has an amusing list of examples. I suppose I should make an updated list sometime.
- tomjakubowski 3y agoalmost certainly an innocent mistake, not "lying"
- olliej 3y agoIf it cannot be read without logging in, then it is inaccessible. That's a choice twitter gets to make, but to claim tweets are accessible because some people can read them is no different from posting links to a private facebook group and saying "you just need to be a member of that group". That said, I was saying it is inaccessible because I am getting error messages trying to load it.
- dylan604 3y ago>Hence, it can be both available and not available. So Musk has given us the real life Schrödinger's cat?