> Except humans can transparently explain themselves and someone can be held to account when something goes wrong Except humans are excellent at finding excuse

> Except humans can transparently explain themselves and someone can be held to account when something goes wrong Except humans are excellent at finding excuses to avoid explaining themselves and being held to account, or to justify some misguided belief based on whatever output they have been "trained on" in their past. People often seem to apply standards to AI in terms of rationality and reliability which even many humans cannot achieve, using terms like "hallucination" when we've seen humans do the exact same by confidently talking about things they know nothing about. Everyone laughed at Bing insisting on a wrong date to avoid admitting it's wrong about the Avatar 2 release, when that's very typical behaviour of humans in certain situations. I'm not trying to make LLMs seem better than they are, but parts of its weaknesses are not surprising given the training data.