3 ms·
I love this video, thanks for sharing it. I'm watching it right now and I think I'm going to refer to his "teapot supremacy" from now on.
by dataflow 3y ago
I love this video, thanks for sharing it. I'm watching it right now and I think I'm going to refer to his "teapot supremacy" from now on.
- AlexCoventry 3y agoI declare AlexCoventry supremacy. No one can compute AlexCoventry better than I can. :-)
- pieter_mj 3y agoWait until you see a GTP5 simulation of yourself.
- tsimionescu 3y agoThere is also an interesting response to that video from a leading quantum computer scientist, Scott Aaronson: https://scottaaronson.blog/?p=5460 https://scottaaronson.blog/?p=5460 He actually goes into significant details about your exact question and proposes some resolutions. It's quite long and I don't think I can do it justice in a TLDR so leaving the link to speak for itself.
- dataflow 3y agoThanks for the link! I'll take a look. Edit: I just read it and I don't feel like he really answered the question. He had a rebuttal about being able to freely specify parameters, but then his Facebook friend addressed his rebuttal, to which he replies "this is indeed more interesting"... which, well, it certainly is, and also doesn't answer the question! (Well, I guess he also mentions we should expect speedup greater than Avogadro's number, which seems fair, but clearly that's not the bar anyone is claiming to meet, so it doesn't get us anywhere.)