3 ms·
...GPT? If so, what prompt did you use?
by nazgul17 3y ago
...GPT? If so, what prompt did you use?
- hyperdimension 3y agoHe used the Retro Encabulator to generate this text. https://youtube.com/watch?v=RXJKdh1KZ0w https://youtube.com/watch?v=RXJKdh1KZ0w (my favorite version) It's an old engineering in-joke. Edit: oops, thought your comment was a reply to 'mindcrime. I'm keeping it here though for the lucky (very lucky in this case) 10,000.
- mindcrime 3y agoI would love to see the out-takes from recording this, and see how many times the actor just broke out laughing his ass off, spewing all that gibberish!
- logicallee 3y agohttps://chat.openai.com/share/19634ae8-0c49-4e3f-bc97-229aaa3e3a20 https://chat.openai.com/share/19634ae8-0c49-4e3f-bc97-229aaa... At the end of the prompt I tell it to judge its results against my requirements because I was afraid it would use real words, since it usually shouldn’t be making words up as part of its output - let alone making the whole output nonsense - so this is a tough task for it. If you tell it to judge itself it is less likely to do the wrong thing. (It doesn’t like to end up printing “I disobeyed all the instructions since I used real words” - it’ll rework its output to be more correct. It’s like a cook, if you ask for a chicken pie and then to tell you if what it just cooked is a chicken pie it won’t bake you an apple pie instead. Unlike a real cook, it doesn’t have enough awareness to judge itself if you don’t ask it to.) It still used the term isotopes. The original didn’t include any real words like that. So it didn’t really meet ALL of my requirements which said “don’t use any real technical words”. It should have changed it to isotrypes or something. It is still a very impressive result. ChatGPT truly understands the prompt and can really think, as evidenced by its summary at the end, even though I didn’t mention that my request was for comedic effect.