3 ms·
That is the issue, but that means that to say that we'll never have self-driving cars is to say that we're either at or close to the limit on advancement of com
by idopmstuff 3y ago
That is the issue, but that means that to say that we'll never have self-driving cars is to say that we're either at or close to the limit on advancement of computing technology. That seems implausible to me, and if you don't accept it as a premise, then it's just a question of how long it is before computers surpass people at all of those things.
- xyzelement 3y agoYou are making a lot of sense, you are setting up logical arguments but some folks go like "uhhh I just don't think so"
- Detrytus 3y ago>> [...] is to say that we're either at or close to the limit on advancement of computing technology. Well, we are approaching physical limits of minimum transistor size, so that might not be as ridiculous as you think. What if the best we can do is to triple the current processing power, but that's not enough?
- idopmstuff 3y agoThat would do it, and I genuinely thank you for being the first person to come up with a counterargument to any of my comments that didn't just involve trying to rules lawyer my language.