4 ms·
I mean. We can compare the hype pattern between the two and still acknowledge that one has utility while the other doesn't. Both have resulted in a bunch of ho
by hagbarth 3y ago
I mean. We can compare the hype pattern between the two and still acknowledge that one has utility while the other doesn't.
Both have resulted in a bunch of hopefuls starting companies, in order to attract mountains of venture capital. Companies that will only have a loose connection to the tech that drives the hype.
- one_level_deep 3y agoThe same could be said about the microprocessor or any other tech innovation throughout history. They all lead to new companies chasing investment dollars. Is there any insight from this observation?
- afavour 3y ago> Is there any insight from this observation? Yes: be deeply skeptical of anyone claiming tech they are personally invested in is revolutionary.
- one_level_deep 3y agoIf someone believes a technology is revolutionary, investing money in it is the most rational thing to do, right?