3 ms·
"Surveillance capitalism" companies should be charged with stalking: their goal is to collect all info on all people, placed, and things. And they ought to be
by mikece 3y ago
"Surveillance capitalism" companies should be charged with stalking: their goal is to collect all info on all people, placed, and things. And they ought to be charged as accomplices to anyone using their datasets to facilitate criminal activity. I know... it's an unpopular and unrealistic opinion.
- WarOnPrivacy 3y ago> Surveillance capitalism" companies should be charged... (replying to what you didn't say) Extend the existing dumb automatic copyright to our personal data so that buyers/sellers have to pay royalties.
- tremon 3y agoRoyalties for transfer of personal data sounds like a great idea, actually. But how can it be enforced/monitored?
- mnky9800n 3y agoEFF led class action lawsuits.
- WarOnPrivacy 3y agoOh it's a totally unrealistic fantasy. I just like to dream.
- gruez 3y ago>Extend the existing dumb automatic copyright to our personal data so that buyers/sellers have to pay royalties. Have you seen the terms of service for social media sites? There's a clause in there that grants them a non-exclusive transferable irrecoverable royalty-free license to whatever you post on the site. What makes you think that companies won't add the same clause for your personal data?
- adrianN 3y agoAt least that would it harder to sell whatever cars record without consent.
- DeathArrow 3y ago>"Surveillance capitalism" companies should be charged with stalking: What if government agencies and oligarchies benefit form that stalking, too?
- shadowgovt 3y agoWhen the newspaper runs an obituary and the next day that person's home is robbed because criminals saw the obit, used publicly accessible records to figure out the address of their home, and made an educated guess that nobody would be there because the previous owner was dead--- Is the newspaper an accomplice?
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]