Yeah, you're right. I just think that what the article argues for is a just a worse version of trunk-oriented git usage. Every benefit the article names is avai

Yeah, you're right. I just think that what the article argues for is a just a worse version of trunk-oriented git usage. Every benefit the article names is available via git, but git also gets me a place to share and automatically test my changes (which might be a simple but risky refactoring) without literally editing the trunk. If there is a benefit to true trunk-based development over just trunk-oriented DVCSs usage, the article did not describe it.