3 ms·
The difference in quality between the second (inserted, obviously professional) picture and the third (original from the nanosnap) in hilarious. Though it does
by c0balt 3y ago
The difference in quality between the second (inserted, obviously professional) picture and the third (original from the nanosnap) in hilarious. Though it does look like a neat bit of engineering.
- throwaway290 3y agoI actually like the third one. It's not for high quality stuff anyway, it's for slice of life snaps. Worse is better
- daneel_w 3y agoGood definition brings a lot of value to street photography in my opinion - for the moment right then and there, and for the history it documents.
- throwaway290 3y agoslice of life snap is very different from street photography... it's the blurry unfocused faces or other parts of your friends being in the moment feeling doing things
- daneel_w 3y agoThat just sounds like a ridiculously narrow and specific subcategory of street/flâneur photography.
- throwaway290 3y agoit's not generally done in the street for one and flaneuring has nothing to do with it. no need to keep making guesses, it's okay to not know something.
- daneel_w 3y agoStreet photography does not have to be in the street. The name never really had a mandatorily fixed connection to the practical expressions of the genre, or the artistic phenomenon that it is. It's about moments in passing, casual observations etc. I write this (and previous comments) as someone with a profound love for photography and that genre in particular, not as someone throwing random guesses. But thank you for the quip retort.
- throwaway290 3y agoSorry. You are talking about some kind of photography where "definition" is important. I am not talking about that kind of photography. I am talking about the kind of photography for which people use cheap film cameras, expired film, disposable cameras, cheap digital compacts. "Definition" is of very little importance. > Street photography does not have to be in the street. Well that's another can of worms I guess. People tagging random non-street shots as street photography is my personal pet peeve...