4 ms·
In the history of humanity, intellectual property is a relatively recent phenomenon. A lot of technology and culture was built without such “protection”. I so
by noizejoy 3y ago
In the history of humanity, intellectual property is a relatively recent phenomenon.
A lot of technology and culture was built without such “protection”.
I sometimes wonder how recent history would have played out without copyrights and patents.
- dash2 3y agoYes, but in the history of humanity, economic growth of above 0.1% a year is also relatively recent. One of the things that C18 radicals insisted upon was a decent system of IP.
- Grimblewald 3y agoId argue we're likely relating economic growth (which is measured by contended metrics) to the boom in quality of life we've seen. The problem with this is that the improvements in materials chemistry that have allowed for all these magical things was on the cusp of happening with or without IP. The drive for developing an IP system was more out of necessity in order to capitalize on the coming boom than it was to help that boom occur. Case in point: look how far LLM's have come since llama hit the public sphere vs. how far organisations like google managed to get, with more time and more resources at their disposal.
- dash2 3y agoMaterials chemistry sounds more like the second Industrial Revolution (post 1870) than the first.
- explodingwaffle 3y agoC18 radicals?
- areyousure 3y agohttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Combat_18 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Combat_18 is my best guess.
- TheCoelacanth 3y ago18th century, I would assume.
- carlosjobim 3y agoIntellectual and artistic pursuits would be sponsored by rich and powerful people, because it would reflect badly on their honour if they didn't. Now that we're all equals, the rich and powerful don't have to do any such things anymore.