A 50% emission reduction is huge, especially in the context of being able to reuse most of our hydrocarbon-compatible infrastructure. Not everything needs to be

A 50% emission reduction is huge, especially in the context of being able to reuse most of our hydrocarbon-compatible infrastructure. Not everything needs to be on orders of magnitude to be worth doing. I agree that nuclear power needs to be a larger part of the story. But the author should motivate that without relying on misleading categorizations.