4 ms·
Stackoverflow is not a community, it's a business, and their business is reselling that sense of community to third parties. I've no quarrel with Stackoverflow
by qwe123_troll 15y ago
Stackoverflow is not a community, it's a business, and their business is reselling that sense of community to third parties.
I've no quarrel with Stackoverflow, it's a very nice site and a useful project. I do have a quarrel with people whose brains seem to turn off once anything 'Web2.0' is involved. Just because it's on the web doesn't mean that the laws of economics and common sense no longer apply.
- dolbz 15y agoWhy must community and business be mutually exclusive? Hint: they're not, and SO is both.
- qwe123_troll 15y agoBecause to survive as a business SO needs to sell your sense of 'comunity' to a third-party resource. Not that there's anything wrong with that, just be aware that when you're participating on SO you're only a 'human resource', to be marketed and sold sometime later in the future. Hopefully SO is run by decent guys and the buyer will be ethical.
- tadfisher 15y agoBy "sell" you're implying that the sense of community is in some way diminished by selling advertising. I don't find this to be the case, unless it leads to a conflict of interest (i.e. SO deletes all Linux articles at the behest of Microsoft). Now if you were to use "capitalize on", "monetize", or one of the many verbs that don't imply a transfer of ownership, then I would agree with you.