You provide two reviews, the article provides many more, along with 8 that they decided did not meet their standards, but they linked them anyway. In comparing

You provide two reviews, the article provides many more, along with 8 that they decided did not meet their standards, but they linked them anyway. In comparing reviews of reviews of medical papers, I find myself more swayed by the article. Perhaps you'll have a different take on that part and can provide compelling evidence of why your studies should carry more weight or why the authors conclusion is flawed. I would definitely be interested in a more critical reading of that, since I'm somewhat neutral but may have some biases towards wanting aspartame to be both safe and effective.